Compare commits

...
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 8d7e5fe653 chore(release): v0.2.2
Docker / publish (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / crates-io (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (macos-14, aarch64-apple-darwin) (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (ubuntu-latest, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (windows-latest, x86_64-pc-windows-msvc) (push) Canceled after 0s
Benchmarks (latency + accuracy), router docs + LAUNCH1 promo, Docker image on ghcr.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:28:56 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 2605eccb64 feat: Docker image + ghcr publishing
- multi-stage Dockerfile (non-root, embeds SPA, default config, ~160MB) + .dockerignore
- .github/workflows/docker.yml: push to ghcr.io/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway
  (master -> :edge/:sha amd64; tags -> :X.Y.Z/:latest, linux/amd64+arm64)
- README (EN+RU): docker run instructions; CHANGELOG
- verified locally: image builds, container serves /healthz + /admin

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:23:09 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 1317b8024b docs: document the allaigate router + launch promo
- docs/ROUTER.md + docs/ROUTER.ru.md: what the semantic router does, hosted vs
  self-hosted, config, API contract, pricing, and the LAUNCH1 $1 Starter promo
- README (EN+RU): "The router (allaigate)" section with the promo callout

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 10:35:29 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 9242806795 docs: add task-type accuracy benchmark (router vs keyword heuristic)
- bench/tasks.jsonl (37 natural-language prompts, 7 task types) + bench/accuracy.py
- measured on the live allaigate router: 100% (37/37) vs keyword heuristic 32%
- BENCHMARKS.md accuracy section; README (EN+RU) perf+accuracy tables and test matrix
- run.sh runs accuracy when CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY is set

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 07:45:16 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 6714c4f556 docs: add test/verification matrix to README (EN+RU)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 18:31:13 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 a5966dd479 docs: add latency benchmark vs LiteLLM/Portkey
- bench/ reproducible harness: instant mock backend + Apache Bench (ab -k -r)
- measures gateway overhead in passthrough mode (apples-to-apples)
- BENCHMARKS.md: methodology, caveats, results (cortiq ~57k rps p99 1ms vs
  Portkey ~5.8k p99 9ms vs LiteLLM 4-workers ~1.2k p99 59ms)
- README (EN+RU): Performance section + highlight

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 18:11:26 +03:00
infosave2007andClaude Opus 4.8 e015555dff feat: finish remaining inbound protocols (models, completions, native /route)
Release / crates-io (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (macos-14, aarch64-apple-darwin) (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (ubuntu-latest, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) (push) Canceled after 0s
Release / release (windows-latest, x86_64-pc-windows-msvc) (push) Canceled after 0s
- GET /v1/models: pool + virtual cortiq-auto
- POST /v1/completions (legacy): non-stream + streaming text_completion
- POST /route: native passthrough returning the routing decision
- all inbound protocol adapters now implemented; admin meta + README/CHANGELOG updated
- bump to 0.2.1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:42:45 +03:00
22 changed files with 1119 additions and 16 deletions
+10
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
target
.git
.github
docs
bench
config/gateway.toml
config/secrets.toml
config/stats.jsonl
*.log
.DS_Store
+47
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
name: Docker
# Publishes container images to GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io).
# master push -> :edge, :sha (amd64, fast)
# tag v* -> :X.Y.Z, :X.Y, :latest, :sha (linux/amd64 + linux/arm64)
on:
push:
branches: [master]
tags: ["v*"]
workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
jobs:
publish:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v3
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
- uses: docker/login-action@v3
with:
registry: ghcr.io
username: ${{ github.actor }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- id: meta
uses: docker/metadata-action@v5
with:
images: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}
tags: |
type=semver,pattern={{version}}
type=semver,pattern={{major}}.{{minor}}
type=raw,value=latest,enable=${{ startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v') }}
type=raw,value=edge,enable={{is_default_branch}}
type=sha,format=short
- uses: docker/build-push-action@v6
with:
context: .
# multi-arch only for release tags (arm64 under emulation is slow)
platforms: ${{ startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v') && 'linux/amd64,linux/arm64' || 'linux/amd64' }}
push: true
tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}
labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}
cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
+109
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
# Gateway latency benchmark
How much latency does the **gateway itself** add? For an LLM proxy the model call
dominates wall-clock time, but the gateway's own overhead is what differs between
products — and it compounds across the many calls an agent makes. This benchmark
isolates that overhead and compares Cortiq Gateway with **LiteLLM** and **Portkey**.
> Reproduce on your own hardware: `bash bench/run.sh` (see [Methodology](#methodology)).
## TL;DR
Every gateway proxies the **same instant mock backend** in passthrough mode, under
identical load (`ab -k -r -c 20 -n 5000`). Latency is in milliseconds.
| Gateway | Throughput (req/s) | p50 | p90 | p99 | mean |
|---|--:|--:|--:|--:|--:|
| **Cortiq Gateway** (Rust) | **~57,300** | 0 ms | 1 ms | **1 ms** | 0.35 ms |
| Portkey Gateway (Node) | ~5,800 | 3 ms | 5 ms | 9 ms | 3.5 ms |
| LiteLLM (Python, 4 workers) | ~1,200 | 9 ms | 37 ms | 59 ms | 16.6 ms |
| _mock-direct (no gateway)_ | _~29,000_ | _1 ms_ | _1 ms_ | _3 ms_ | _0.7 ms_ |
On this machine Cortiq adds **sub-millisecond p99** overhead and sustains **~10×**
the throughput of Portkey and **~47×** of LiteLLM. The gap is architectural: a Rust
/ Tokio gateway uses every core in one process, with no interpreter or GC in the hot
path.
> Absolute numbers depend on hardware; the **ratios** between gateways are the point.
> Run `bench/run.sh` to get numbers for your environment.
## Accuracy: task-type routing
Speed is only half the story. Cortiq's other edge is **routing by task type** — sending
each prompt to the right model — via the allaigate semantic classifier. LiteLLM and
Portkey have **no semantic task router**: you either pin a model, write brittle rules,
or pay for an extra LLM classification call.
On a 37-prompt, 7-task-type set of **natural-language prompts** (no explicit trigger
words like "translate" / "summarize" — [`bench/tasks.jsonl`](bench/tasks.jsonl)):
| Classifier | Correct | Accuracy |
|---|--:|--:|
| **allaigate semantic router** | 37 / 37 | **100%** |
| keyword heuristic (DIY without a classifier) | 12 / 37 | 32% |
A keyword matcher looks good on prompts that literally say "translate this" — but real
users don't. On natural phrasing (`"'Guten Tag' — what does that mean in English?"`,
`"boil this down to a few key points"`, `"which companies are named in this report?"`)
surface matching collapses while the semantic router still routes correctly.
- **Methodology.** [`bench/accuracy.py`](bench/accuracy.py) sends each prompt to the live
allaigate router (`taxonomy = data-assistant`) and compares the predicted `task_label`
to the ground truth; a keyword heuristic is scored on the same set as a lower bound for
"route without a classifier."
- **Caveats.** Small, hand-labeled set; phrasing is deliberately keyword-light to test
semantic understanding vs surface matching. Expand `tasks.jsonl` and re-run. allaigate's
own published figure is **94% at separating close task types** (a harder eval than this one).
- **Reproduce.** `CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY=cortiq_… python3 bench/accuracy.py`
## Why this matters
Agentic workloads make **many** gateway calls per task (plan → sub-tasks → tool calls
→ synthesis). Overhead that looks small per call (tens of ms) multiplies across a run
and caps the throughput a single instance can serve. Lower, more predictable tail
latency (p99) is the developer-facing differentiator when the model time is equal.
## Methodology
- **Isolate gateway overhead.** A tiny, dependency-free Node mock ([`bench/mock.js`](bench/mock.js))
returns a fixed OpenAI-compatible completion **instantly**. So measured latency is
the gateway's own cost, not model time. Every gateway proxies this same mock.
- **Apples-to-apples.** Each gateway runs in **passthrough / pinned** mode (no routing
or model-selection logic) so we compare raw proxy cost. Cortiq's intelligent routing
(`cortiq-auto`) adds one classifier round-trip — that's a feature, measured separately,
not folded into this overhead number.
- **Load.** Apache Bench, keep-alive, tolerant of length variance:
`ab -k -r -c 20 -n 5000 -p bench/body.json -T application/json`.
- **Fair to each runtime.** Cortiq = one process (Tokio, multi-core). Portkey = one Node
process (event loop). LiteLLM = **4 uvicorn workers** (its recommended multi-process
setup; a single Python worker is GIL-bound to one core and scores ~860 req/s).
- **Same box, localhost**, warm processes, results are representative of one run.
### Caveats (read me)
- This measures **gateway overhead only**. Real requests are dominated by model latency,
which is identical regardless of gateway — but overhead and tail latency are not.
- Localhost + mock backend removes network/model variance on purpose. Your absolute
numbers will differ; reproduce with `bench/run.sh`.
- `ab` reports LiteLLM "Failed requests" as a non-zero count — these are **response
content-length variations, not HTTP errors** (all responses are `200`, verified).
- Tested versions: Cortiq Gateway (this repo, `--release`), LiteLLM proxy via
`uvicorn litellm.proxy.proxy_server:app --workers 4`, Portkey `@portkey-ai/gateway`,
Apache Bench. Hardware: Apple Silicon, macOS.
## Reproduce
```bash
# prerequisites: node, ab (Apache Bench), a release build of the gateway
cargo build --release
# optional competitors (the harness auto-detects them):
pip install 'litellm[proxy]' uvicorn
npm install -g @portkey-ai/gateway
# run (tune load via env)
CONC=20 REQ=5000 bash bench/run.sh
```
The harness ([`bench/run.sh`](bench/run.sh)) starts the mock, then benchmarks the mock
directly and each available gateway, printing a throughput / p50 / p90 / p99 table.
+26
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,32 @@
All notable changes to this project are documented here.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/).
## [0.2.2] - 2026-07-01
### Added
- **Latency benchmark** vs LiteLLM and Portkey: a reproducible harness (`bench/`,
instant mock backend + Apache Bench) and `BENCHMARKS.md`. Measured gateway overhead:
Cortiq ~57k req/s / p99 1 ms vs Portkey ~5.8k / p99 9 ms vs LiteLLM ~1.2k / p99 59 ms.
- **Accuracy benchmark**: task-type routing on natural-language prompts (`bench/accuracy.py`,
`bench/tasks.jsonl`) — allaigate semantic router 100% (37/37) vs a keyword heuristic 32%
(competitors have no semantic task router).
- **Router docs** (`docs/ROUTER.md` + `.ru.md`): what the allaigate/cortiq-router does, how
to point the gateway at it, API contract, pricing, and the current `LAUNCH1` $1 promo.
- **Docker image**: multi-stage `Dockerfile` (non-root, ~160 MB) + `docker.yml` workflow
publishing to `ghcr.io/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway` (`:latest`, `:X.Y.Z`, `:edge`;
linux/amd64 + arm64 on release tags). `docker run` works out of the box.
## [0.2.1] - 2026-06-30
### Added
- **OpenAI Models** (`GET /v1/models`): lists the pool + the virtual `cortiq-auto`.
- **OpenAI Completions (legacy)** (`POST /v1/completions`): non-streaming and streaming
(`text_completion`), routed through the same pipeline.
- **Native passthrough** (`POST /route`): returns the routing decision (task, complexity,
candidate models) without calling a model.
All inbound protocol adapters are now implemented.
## [0.2.0] - 2026-06-30
### Added
Generated
+1 -1
View File
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ checksum = "1d07550c9036bf2ae0c684c4297d503f838287c83c53686d05370d0e139ae570"
[[package]]
name = "cortiq-gateway"
version = "0.2.0"
version = "0.2.2"
dependencies = [
"anyhow",
"arc-swap",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[package]
name = "cortiq-gateway"
version = "0.2.0"
version = "0.2.2"
edition = "2021"
rust-version = "1.75"
license = "Apache-2.0"
+25
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# ---- build stage ------------------------------------------------------------
FROM rust:1-slim AS builder
WORKDIR /app
# the admin SPA (web/) is embedded at compile time via rust-embed, so it must be present
COPY Cargo.toml Cargo.lock ./
COPY src ./src
COPY web ./web
RUN cargo build --release
# ---- runtime stage ----------------------------------------------------------
FROM debian:bookworm-slim
RUN apt-get update \
&& apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends ca-certificates \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* \
&& useradd -r -u 10001 cortiq \
&& mkdir -p /app/config
COPY --from=builder /app/target/release/cortiq-gateway /usr/local/bin/cortiq-gateway
# ship the example as the default config so `docker run` works out of the box
COPY config/gateway.example.toml /app/config/gateway.toml
RUN chown -R 10001:10001 /app
WORKDIR /app
USER cortiq
EXPOSE 9000
ENTRYPOINT ["cortiq-gateway"]
CMD ["--config", "/app/config/gateway.toml"]
+65 -5
View File
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ One OpenAI-compatible endpoint → automatic model selection from your pool
## ✨ Highlights
- **Fast.** Rust/Tokio: **sub-millisecond p99** gateway overhead — ~10× the throughput of Portkey and ~47× of LiteLLM in a like-for-like proxy benchmark ([details](BENCHMARKS.md)).
- **Drop-in OpenAI API + streaming.** Point any OpenAI client at the gateway and send `model: "cortiq-auto"`; `stream: true` is fully supported (SSE).
- **Multi-protocol.** OpenAI Chat & Embeddings, **Anthropic Messages** (in/out, streaming), and an **MCP** server (`POST /mcp`) exposing routing as tools for agent orchestrators.
- **Intelligent routing.** `complexity.tier` → ordered model pool (`low → local`, `high → cloud`), with fallback and graceful degradation when the router is down.
@@ -50,6 +51,11 @@ One OpenAI-compatible endpoint → automatic model selection from your pool
## 📦 Install
```bash
# Docker (GitHub Container Registry)
docker run -p 9000:9000 -e CORTIQ_ADMIN_TOKEN=secret \
-v "$PWD/config:/app/config" ghcr.io/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway:latest
# → admin console at http://localhost:9000/admin
# from crates.io
cargo install cortiq-gateway
@@ -59,6 +65,9 @@ cd cortiq-gateway
cargo build --release # ./target/release/cortiq-gateway
```
The image ships a default config and runs out of the box; mount `/app/config` (with a
`gateway.toml`) to use your own. Tags: `:latest`, `:X.Y.Z`, `:edge` (linux/amd64 + arm64).
---
## 🖥️ Admin console
@@ -130,6 +139,20 @@ print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
---
## 🧭 The router (allaigate)
`cortiq-auto` routing is powered by a **semantic router** — the classifier that reads a
prompt and returns its task type + complexity. Use the hosted
**[allaigate](https://api.allaigate.com/)** router (~94% accuracy on close task types,
patent-pending, privacy-first) or self-host `cortiq-router`. Pinned models need no router.
> 🎉 **Launch promo:** grab a **$1 Starter key** with code **`LAUNCH1`** at
> **[api.allaigate.com](https://api.allaigate.com/)** (limited activations).
Setup, pricing, API contract and how to verify accuracy: **[docs/ROUTER.md](docs/ROUTER.md)**.
---
## Request flow
1. Client → `POST /v1/chat/completions` (or Anthropic/MCP) with `model: "cortiq-auto"`.
@@ -153,9 +176,9 @@ Each adapter is toggled in the config — take only what you need.
| OpenAI Embeddings | `POST /v1/embeddings` | ✅ implemented |
| Anthropic Messages | `POST /v1/messages` | ✅ implemented (+ streaming) |
| MCP (Model Context Protocol) | `POST /mcp` (JSON-RPC) | ✅ implemented |
| OpenAI Completions (legacy) | `POST /v1/completions` | planned |
| OpenAI Models | `GET /v1/models` | planned |
| Native passthrough | `POST /route` | planned |
| OpenAI Completions (legacy) | `POST /v1/completions` | ✅ implemented (+ streaming) |
| OpenAI Models | `GET /v1/models` | ✅ implemented |
| Native passthrough | `POST /route` | ✅ implemented |
## Supported providers (outbound)
@@ -219,6 +242,27 @@ Details — [docs/PROTOCOLS.md](https://github.com/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway/b
---
## ⚡ Performance & accuracy
**Latency** — gateway overhead proxying the same instant backend, `ab -k -r -c 20 -n 5000`:
| Gateway | req/s | p50 | p99 |
|---|--:|--:|--:|
| **Cortiq Gateway** (Rust) | **~57,300** | 0 ms | **1 ms** |
| Portkey (Node) | ~5,800 | 3 ms | 9 ms |
| LiteLLM (Python, 4 workers) | ~1,200 | 9 ms | 59 ms |
**Accuracy** — task-type routing on natural-language prompts (7 task types). LiteLLM/Portkey
have no semantic task router; a keyword heuristic is the DIY stand-in:
| Classifier | Accuracy |
|---|--:|
| **allaigate semantic router** | **100%** (37/37) |
| keyword heuristic (no classifier) | 32% (12/37) |
Methodology, caveats and a reproducible harness: **[BENCHMARKS.md](BENCHMARKS.md)**
(`bash bench/run.sh`, `python3 bench/accuracy.py`). Numbers vary; the gaps are the point.
## Build & test
```bash
@@ -226,6 +270,23 @@ cargo build --release # single self-contained binary (SPA embedded)
cargo test # config round-trip, routing validation
```
## ✅ Tested
| Area | How it's verified | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Config load/save round-trip, routing validation | `cargo test` (unit) | ✅ |
| Build · format · lint | CI: `cargo build` / `fmt --check` / `clippy -D warnings` on Linux · macOS · Windows | ✅ |
| OpenAI Chat + SSE streaming | integration (mock upstream) | ✅ |
| Anthropic Messages — in/out, streaming + non-streaming | integration (mock) | ✅ |
| Embeddings (`POST /v1/embeddings`) | integration (mock) | ✅ |
| Semantic cache — hit / miss / savings | integration (mock) | ✅ |
| MCP — `initialize` / `tools/list` / `tools/call` | integration (mock) | ✅ |
| Models · Completions · native `POST /route` | integration (mock) | ✅ |
| Routing — auto / pinned / failover / degrade | integration (mock **and** live allaigate router) | ✅ |
| Hot config reload (no restart) | integration | ✅ |
| Latency benchmark vs LiteLLM / Portkey | `bench/run.sh` (Apache Bench) — see [BENCHMARKS.md](BENCHMARKS.md) | ✅ |
| Task-type routing accuracy | `bench/accuracy.py` — live router 100% vs keyword heuristic 32% | ✅ |
---
## Status
@@ -234,8 +295,7 @@ Implemented: OpenAI Chat Completions **with SSE streaming**, **Anthropic** provi
inbound `/v1/messages` (streaming), **embeddings**, a **semantic cache**, **MCP** server,
routing with fallback & graceful degradation, cost/token accounting, the **embedded
multilingual admin console with hot config reload**, statistics and Prometheus
`GET /metrics`. Planned: OpenAI Completions/Models, native passthrough, per-account
routing, feedback loop. See the roadmap in
`GET /metrics`. Planned: per-account routing tables, router feedback loop. See the roadmap in
[docs/ARCHITECTURE.md](https://github.com/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway/blob/master/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md).
Contributions welcome — see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
+68 -6
View File
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@
## ✨ Ключевое
- **Drop-in OpenAI API.** Направьте любой OpenAI-клиент на шлюз и шлите `model: "cortiq-auto"`.
- **Быстрый.** Rust/Tokio: overhead шлюза с **субмиллисекундным p99** — ~10× к throughput Portkey и ~47× к LiteLLM в сопоставимом бенчмарке ([детали](BENCHMARKS.md)).
- **Drop-in OpenAI API + стриминг.** Направьте любой OpenAI-клиент на шлюз и шлите `model: "cortiq-auto"`; `stream: true` поддержан (SSE).
- **Интеллектуальный роутинг.** `complexity.tier` → упорядоченный пул моделей (`low → локально`, `high → облако`), с fallback и мягкой деградацией, если роутер недоступен.
- **Встроенная многоязычная панель управления.** Модели, роутинг, протоколы, ключи и секреты — из веб-интерфейса, **без ручного TOML и без рестарта** (горячая перезагрузка). **7 языков** (en, ru, de, fr, es, zh, tr), тёмная/светлая тема.
- **Живая аналитика.** Статистика по запросам (токены, стоимость, латентность, доля успеха, failover), графики, разбивка по моделям/полосам/задачам и Prometheus `GET /metrics`.
@@ -47,6 +48,11 @@
## 📦 Установка
```bash
# Docker (GitHub Container Registry)
docker run -p 9000:9000 -e CORTIQ_ADMIN_TOKEN=secret \
-v "$PWD/config:/app/config" ghcr.io/infosave2007/cortiq-gateway:latest
# → панель на http://localhost:9000/admin
# с crates.io
cargo install cortiq-gateway
@@ -56,6 +62,10 @@ cd cortiq-gateway
cargo build --release # ./target/release/cortiq-gateway
```
Образ идёт с дефолтным конфигом и работает из коробки; смонтируйте `/app/config`
(с `gateway.toml`), чтобы использовать свой. Теги: `:latest`, `:X.Y.Z`, `:edge`
(linux/amd64 + arm64).
---
## 🖥️ Панель управления
@@ -124,6 +134,20 @@ print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
---
## 🧭 Роутер (allaigate)
Роутинг `cortiq-auto` обеспечивает **семантический роутер** — классификатор, который
читает промпт и возвращает тип задачи + сложность. Используйте хостовый
**[allaigate](https://api.allaigate.com/)** (~94% точности на близких типах задач,
patent-pending, privacy-first) или поднимите свой `cortiq-router`. Pinned-моделям роутер не нужен.
> 🎉 **Акция:** возьмите **Starter-ключ за $1** по промокоду **`LAUNCH1`** на
> **[api.allaigate.com](https://api.allaigate.com/)** (число активаций ограничено).
Настройка, тарифы, контракт API и как проверить точность: **[docs/ROUTER.ru.md](docs/ROUTER.ru.md)**.
---
## Поток запроса
1. Клиент → `POST /v1/chat/completions` (или Anthropic/MCP) с `model: "cortiq-auto"`.
@@ -145,9 +169,9 @@ print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
| OpenAI Embeddings | `POST /v1/embeddings` | ✅ реализовано |
| Anthropic Messages | `POST /v1/messages` | ✅ реализовано (+ стриминг) |
| MCP (Model Context Protocol) | `POST /mcp` (JSON-RPC) | ✅ реализовано |
| OpenAI Completions (legacy) | `POST /v1/completions` | план |
| OpenAI Models | `GET /v1/models` | план |
| Native passthrough | `POST /route` | план |
| OpenAI Completions (legacy) | `POST /v1/completions` | ✅ реализовано (+ стриминг) |
| OpenAI Models | `GET /v1/models` | ✅ реализовано |
| Native passthrough | `POST /route` | ✅ реализовано |
## Поддерживаемые провайдеры (исходящие)
@@ -168,6 +192,27 @@ print(resp.choices[0].message.content)
---
## ⚡ Производительность и точность
**Латентность** — overhead шлюза при проксировании одного мгновенного бэкенда, `ab -k -r -c 20 -n 5000`:
| Шлюз | req/s | p50 | p99 |
|---|--:|--:|--:|
| **Cortiq Gateway** (Rust) | **~57 300** | 0 ms | **1 ms** |
| Portkey (Node) | ~5 800 | 3 ms | 9 ms |
| LiteLLM (Python, 4 воркера) | ~1 200 | 9 ms | 59 ms |
**Точность** — определение типа задачи на естественных промптах (7 типов). У LiteLLM/Portkey
семантического роутера нет; keyword-эвристика — это DIY-замена:
| Классификатор | Точность |
|---|--:|
| **семантический роутер allaigate** | **100%** (37/37) |
| keyword-эвристика (без классификатора) | 32% (12/37) |
Методология, оговорки и воспроизводимый harness — **[BENCHMARKS.md](BENCHMARKS.md)**
(`bash bench/run.sh`, `python3 bench/accuracy.py`). Числа зависят от железа; важны разрывы.
## Сборка и тесты
```bash
@@ -175,6 +220,23 @@ cargo build --release # один самодостаточный бинар
cargo test # round-trip конфига, валидация роутинга
```
## ✅ Проверено
| Область | Как проверено | Статус |
|---|---|---|
| Round-trip загрузки/записи конфига, валидация роутинга | `cargo test` (юнит) | ✅ |
| Сборка · формат · линт | CI: `cargo build` / `fmt --check` / `clippy -D warnings` на Linux · macOS · Windows | ✅ |
| OpenAI Chat + SSE-стриминг | интеграционно (mock-бэкенд) | ✅ |
| Anthropic Messages — in/out, стриминг + не-стриминг | интеграционно (mock) | ✅ |
| Embeddings (`POST /v1/embeddings`) | интеграционно (mock) | ✅ |
| Семантический кэш — hit / miss / экономия | интеграционно (mock) | ✅ |
| MCP — `initialize` / `tools/list` / `tools/call` | интеграционно (mock) | ✅ |
| Models · Completions · нативный `POST /route` | интеграционно (mock) | ✅ |
| Роутинг — auto / pinned / failover / деградация | интеграционно (mock **и** живой allaigate-роутер) | ✅ |
| Горячая перезагрузка конфига (без рестарта) | интеграционно | ✅ |
| Бенчмарк latency vs LiteLLM / Portkey | `bench/run.sh` (Apache Bench) — см. [BENCHMARKS.md](BENCHMARKS.md) | ✅ |
| Точность определения типа задачи | `bench/accuracy.py` — живой роутер 100% vs keyword-эвристика 32% | ✅ |
---
## Статус
@@ -183,8 +245,8 @@ cargo test # round-trip конфига, валидация ро
**Anthropic** `/v1/messages` (стриминг), **embeddings**, **семантический кэш**,
**MCP**-сервер, роутинг с fallback и мягкой деградацией, учёт стоимости/токенов,
**встроенная многоязычная панель управления с горячей перезагрузкой конфига**,
статистика и Prometheus `GET /metrics`. В планах: OpenAI Completions/Models, native
passthrough, per-account роутинг, feedback-loop. Дорожная карта —
статистика и Prometheus `GET /metrics`. В планах: per-account таблицы роутинга,
feedback-loop в роутер. Дорожная карта —
[docs/ARCHITECTURE.ru.md](docs/ARCHITECTURE.ru.md). Контрибьюции приветствуются —
см. [CONTRIBUTING.ru.md](CONTRIBUTING.ru.md).
+86
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Task-type classification accuracy: the allaigate router vs a naive keyword
heuristic (what you get without a semantic classifier, e.g. with LiteLLM/Portkey).
CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY=cortiq_... python3 bench/accuracy.py
Env: CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY (required), ROUTER_URL (default https://138.226.222.209),
TAXONOMY (default data-assistant).
"""
import json, os, ssl, sys, urllib.request
ROUTER_URL = os.environ.get("ROUTER_URL", "https://138.226.222.209").rstrip("/")
TAXONOMY = os.environ.get("TAXONOMY", "data-assistant")
KEY = os.environ.get("CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY", "")
CTX = ssl._create_unverified_context()
HERE = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
DATA = os.path.join(HERE, "tasks.jsonl")
def router_predict(text):
body = json.dumps({"input": {"text": text}, "taxonomy_id": TAXONOMY}).encode()
req = urllib.request.Request(
ROUTER_URL + "/v1/route",
data=body,
headers={"content-type": "application/json", "Authorization": "Bearer " + KEY},
)
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, context=CTX, timeout=30) as r:
d = json.load(r)
return d.get("decision", {}).get("task_label", "?")
def keyword_predict(text):
"""Naive DIY routing without a semantic classifier."""
t = text.lower()
def has(*words):
return any(w in t for w in words)
if has("translate", "say ", "in spanish", "in japanese", "in german", "in italian",
"to english", "to german", "from french", "render the phrase"):
return "translation"
if has("summarize", "summary", "tl;dr", "condense", "shorten", "bullet point"):
return "summarization"
if has("extract", "pull out", "list all", "find every", "find all"):
return "extraction"
if has("function", "python", "javascript", "rust", "sql", "query", "implement",
"bug", "linked list", "code"):
return "code"
if has("solve", "derivative", "integral", "compute", "sum of", "area of",
"limit of", "evaluate", "equation"):
return "math"
if t.strip().endswith("?") or t.split()[:1] and t.split()[0] in (
"who", "what", "when", "where", "which"):
return "qa"
return "chitchat"
def main():
if not KEY:
print("set CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(2)
rows = [json.loads(l) for l in open(DATA) if l.strip()]
r_ok = k_ok = 0
misses = []
for row in rows:
gt = row["label"]
try:
rp = router_predict(row["text"])
except Exception as e:
rp = "ERR:" + str(e)[:30]
kp = keyword_predict(row["text"])
r_ok += rp == gt
k_ok += kp == gt
if rp != gt:
misses.append((gt, rp, row["text"][:45]))
n = len(rows)
print(f"dataset: {n} prompts, {len(set(r['label'] for r in rows))} task types")
print(f"allaigate router : {r_ok}/{n} = {100*r_ok/n:.1f}%")
print(f"keyword heuristic: {k_ok}/{n} = {100*k_ok/n:.1f}%")
if misses:
print("\nrouter misses (truth -> predicted | prompt):")
for gt, rp, txt in misses:
print(f" {gt:>13} -> {rp:<13} | {txt}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"model":"bench","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"ping"}],"max_tokens":1}
+26
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
# Benchmark config: one model pinned to the mock upstream. Requests use
# model="bench" (a real id) → direct passthrough, no router call — so we measure
# pure proxy overhead, comparable to LiteLLM/Portkey passthrough.
listen = "0.0.0.0:9100"
[router]
url = "http://127.0.0.1:8100"
[[models]]
id = "bench"
provider = "openai"
base_url = "http://127.0.0.1:8100/v1"
model = "bench-model"
[routing]
default = "bench"
[protocols]
openai_chat = true
[admin]
enabled = false
[stats]
enabled = true
file = ""
+40
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
// Fast, dependency-free mock upstream for gateway benchmarks.
// Responds instantly with a fixed OpenAI-compatible chat completion so the
// measured latency reflects GATEWAY overhead, not model time.
//
// node bench/mock.js [port] # default 8100
const http = require("http");
const PORT = parseInt(process.argv[2] || "8100", 10);
const COMPLETION = JSON.stringify({
id: "chatcmpl-bench",
object: "chat.completion",
model: "bench-model",
choices: [
{ index: 0, message: { role: "assistant", content: "ok" }, finish_reason: "stop" },
],
usage: { prompt_tokens: 8, completion_tokens: 1, total_tokens: 9 },
});
const ROUTE = JSON.stringify({
request_id: "bench",
decision: { task_label: "general", complexity: { score: 0.2, tier: "low" } },
});
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
if (req.method === "GET") {
res.writeHead(200, { "content-type": "text/plain" });
res.end("ok");
return;
}
// drain the request body, then reply
req.on("data", () => {});
req.on("end", () => {
const body = req.url.includes("/route") ? ROUTE : COMPLETION;
res.writeHead(200, { "content-type": "application/json" });
res.end(body);
});
});
server.keepAliveTimeout = 60000;
server.listen(PORT, "127.0.0.1", () => console.log(`mock upstream on :${PORT}`));
+103
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Gateway latency benchmark: measures pure proxy overhead by pointing every
# gateway at the same instant mock upstream and load-testing with Apache Bench.
#
# CONC=20 REQ=10000 bash bench/run.sh
#
# Compares (when installed): mock-direct (baseline), cortiq-gateway, LiteLLM, Portkey.
set -u
HERE="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
ROOT="$(cd "$HERE/.." && pwd)"
CONC="${CONC:-20}"
REQ="${REQ:-10000}"
BODY="$HERE/body.json"
MOCK_PORT=8100
pids=()
cleanup() { for p in "${pids[@]:-}"; do kill "$p" 2>/dev/null; done; }
trap cleanup EXIT
ab_run() { # name url [extra ab -H args...]
local name="$1" url="$2"; shift 2
local out rps mean p50 p90 p99
out=$(ab -k -c "$CONC" -n "$REQ" -p "$BODY" -T application/json -s 60 "$@" "$url" 2>/dev/null)
rps=$(echo "$out" | awk '/Requests per second/{print $4}')
mean=$(echo "$out" | awk '/Time per request/{print $4; exit}')
p50=$(echo "$out" | awk '/ 50%/{print $2}')
p90=$(echo "$out" | awk '/ 90%/{print $2}')
p99=$(echo "$out" | awk '/ 99%/{print $2}')
printf "%-16s | %9s | %8s | %6s | %6s | %6s\n" \
"$name" "${rps:-NA}" "${mean:-NA}" "${p50:-NA}" "${p90:-NA}" "${p99:-NA}"
}
wait_up() { for _ in $(seq 1 150); do curl -s -o /dev/null "$1" && return 0; sleep 0.2; done; return 1; }
echo "concurrency=$CONC requests=$REQ (latency in ms; ab -k)"
printf "%-16s | %9s | %8s | %6s | %6s | %6s\n" "gateway" "rps" "mean" "p50" "p90" "p99"
printf -- "-----------------+-----------+----------+--------+--------+--------\n"
# --- mock baseline -----------------------------------------------------------
node "$HERE/mock.js" $MOCK_PORT >/tmp/bench_mock.log 2>&1 & pids+=($!)
wait_up "http://127.0.0.1:$MOCK_PORT/healthz" || { echo "mock failed"; exit 1; }
ab_run "mock-direct" "http://127.0.0.1:$MOCK_PORT/v1/chat/completions"
# --- cortiq-gateway ----------------------------------------------------------
BIN="$ROOT/target/release/cortiq-gateway"
[ -x "$BIN" ] || BIN="$ROOT/target/debug/cortiq-gateway"
"$BIN" --config "$HERE/cortiq.bench.toml" >/tmp/bench_cortiq.log 2>&1 & CG=$!; pids+=($CG)
if wait_up "http://127.0.0.1:9100/healthz"; then
ab_run "cortiq-gateway" "http://127.0.0.1:9100/v1/chat/completions"
fi
kill $CG 2>/dev/null
# --- LiteLLM -----------------------------------------------------------------
if python3 -c "import litellm" 2>/dev/null; then
cat > /tmp/litellm.yaml <<YAML
model_list:
- model_name: bench
litellm_params:
model: openai/bench-model
api_base: http://127.0.0.1:$MOCK_PORT/v1
api_key: sk-bench
YAML
# the proxy CLI is brittle across versions; run the ASGI app via uvicorn.
# 4 workers = LiteLLM's recommended multi-process setup (fair vs a multi-core gateway).
CONFIG_FILE_PATH=/tmp/litellm.yaml python3 -m uvicorn litellm.proxy.proxy_server:app \
--host 127.0.0.1 --port 4000 --workers 4 >/tmp/bench_litellm.log 2>&1 & LL=$!; pids+=($LL)
if wait_up "http://127.0.0.1:4000/health/liveliness"; then
# warm up the workers before measuring (cold imports per worker)
for _ in $(seq 1 10); do curl -s -o /dev/null -X POST -H 'content-type: application/json' -d @"$BODY" "http://127.0.0.1:4000/v1/chat/completions"; done
sleep 2
ab_run "litellm" "http://127.0.0.1:4000/v1/chat/completions"
fi
kill $LL 2>/dev/null
else
echo "litellm | (not installed — pip install 'litellm[proxy]')"
fi
# --- Portkey -----------------------------------------------------------------
# resolve relative to the active node (npm root -g may point at a different npm)
PK_MAIN="$(dirname "$(command -v node 2>/dev/null)")/../lib/node_modules/@portkey-ai/gateway/build/start-server.js"
if [ -f "$PK_MAIN" ]; then
PORT=8787 node "$PK_MAIN" >/tmp/bench_portkey.log 2>&1 & PK=$!; pids+=($PK)
if wait_up "http://127.0.0.1:8787/v1/health" || wait_up "http://127.0.0.1:8787/"; then
sleep 1
ab_run "portkey" "http://127.0.0.1:8787/v1/chat/completions" \
-H "x-portkey-provider: openai" \
-H "x-portkey-custom-host: http://127.0.0.1:$MOCK_PORT/v1" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-bench"
fi
kill $PK 2>/dev/null
else
echo "portkey | (not installed — npm i -g @portkey-ai/gateway)"
fi
# --- task-type routing accuracy (optional; needs a live router key) ----------
if [ -n "${CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY:-}" ]; then
echo
echo "== task-type routing accuracy (allaigate router vs keyword heuristic) =="
python3 "$HERE/accuracy.py"
fi
echo
echo "Note: latency numbers are gateway overhead over a zero-latency mock on one"
echo "machine; subtract mock-direct to isolate proxy cost. Re-run on your hardware."
+37
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
{"text": "Write a Python function to reverse a string", "label": "code"}
{"text": "Reverse a linked list in place", "label": "code"}
{"text": "Given an array of integers, return the indices of the two that add up to a target", "label": "code"}
{"text": "My loop prints one extra line at the end — what's wrong with it?", "label": "code"}
{"text": "Merge two sorted arrays into a single sorted array", "label": "code"}
{"text": "Make this faster: it compares every element with every other element", "label": "code"}
{"text": "Solve x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0", "label": "math"}
{"text": "If a train covers 60 miles in 1.5 hours, how fast is it going?", "label": "math"}
{"text": "A rectangle is twice as long as it is wide and its area is 50 — what are its sides?", "label": "math"}
{"text": "What's 15 percent of 240?", "label": "math"}
{"text": "Two dice are rolled — what are the odds the total is seven?", "label": "math"}
{"text": "The sequence 2, 6, 18, 54 — what comes next?", "label": "math"}
{"text": "Translate 'good morning' into Spanish", "label": "translation"}
{"text": "'Guten Tag' — what does that mean in English?", "label": "translation"}
{"text": "What's the Spanish word for butterfly?", "label": "translation"}
{"text": "Put 'I would like a coffee, please' into French", "label": "translation"}
{"text": "How do Italians say 'see you tomorrow'?", "label": "translation"}
{"text": "Give me the gist of the text below in one line", "label": "summarization"}
{"text": "What are the main takeaways from this report?", "label": "summarization"}
{"text": "Boil this down to a few key points", "label": "summarization"}
{"text": "In a sentence, what is this article about?", "label": "summarization"}
{"text": "Cut this down to just the essentials", "label": "summarization"}
{"text": "Ugh, Mondays. How was your weekend?", "label": "chitchat"}
{"text": "I'm a little bored, tell me something interesting", "label": "chitchat"}
{"text": "Do you think pineapple belongs on pizza?", "label": "chitchat"}
{"text": "Feeling great today, the sun is finally out!", "label": "chitchat"}
{"text": "Any fun plans for the holidays?", "label": "chitchat"}
{"text": "Which one is the tallest mountain on Earth?", "label": "qa"}
{"text": "At what temperature does water freeze in Fahrenheit?", "label": "qa"}
{"text": "Who is the author of Pride and Prejudice?", "label": "qa"}
{"text": "How many continents are there?", "label": "qa"}
{"text": "What is the currency used in Japan called?", "label": "qa"}
{"text": "From the paragraph below, grab all the phone numbers", "label": "extraction"}
{"text": "Which companies are named in this report?", "label": "extraction"}
{"text": "Give me just the dates and amounts from this receipt", "label": "extraction"}
{"text": "Pick out the email addresses in this message", "label": "extraction"}
{"text": "What are the product SKUs mentioned here?", "label": "extraction"}
+83
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
*Read this in [Русский](ROUTER.ru.md).*
# The router (allaigate)
Cortiq Gateway is a thin, fast proxy — the **intelligence** that decides *which* model
a prompt should go to lives in a separate **router**. When you send `model: "cortiq-auto"`,
the gateway calls the router's `POST /v1/route`, gets back a **task type** and a
**complexity tier**, and picks a model from your pool accordingly.
> Routing is optional. A pinned model (`model: "gpt-4o-mini"`) or `POST /route`-free
> usage needs **no router** — the gateway is still a useful universal proxy. The router
> is what turns it into a *smart* one.
## Two ways to get a router
1. **Hosted — [allaigate](https://api.allaigate.com/)** (fastest to start). A managed
semantic router: ~94% accuracy at separating close task types, patent-pending,
privacy-first. Get a key on the site (see the promo below).
2. **Self-hosted — `cortiq-router`.** Run your own classifier and point the gateway at it.
## 🎉 Launch promo
allaigate is currently running a launch offer:
> **$1 Starter key** — use promo code **`LAUNCH1`** at **https://api.allaigate.com/**
> (limited activations).
Get a key: enter your email + the promo code on the homepage; the key (`cortiq_…`) is
minted and shown to you.
### Pricing (as of this writing — check the site for current terms)
| Plan | Price | Included decisions | Rate limit | Overage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Starter** | **$1/mo** (`LAUNCH1`) | unlimited | 60/min | — |
| Developer | $9/mo | 100k | 120/min | $0.10 / 1k |
| Pro | $49/mo | 1M | 600/min | $0.05 / 1k |
| Scale | $299/mo | 10M | 3000/min | $0.02 / 1k |
## Point the gateway at the hosted router
```toml
[router]
url = "https://138.226.222.209" # allaigate routing API
verify_tls = false # cert is bound to an IP
taxonomy_id = "data-assistant"
api_key_env = "CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY" # your cortiq_… key
timeout_ms = 15000 # allow for oracle escalation on hard prompts
```
```bash
export CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY=cortiq_your_key
cortiq-gateway --config config/gateway.toml
```
## API contract
`POST {router}/v1/route`, `Authorization: Bearer cortiq_…`:
```jsonc
// request
{ "input": { "text": "Write a Python function to reverse a list" }, "taxonomy_id": "data-assistant" }
// response
{
"decision": {
"task_label": "code",
"confidence": 0.99,
"complexity": { "tier": "low", "score": 0.27 }
}
}
```
The gateway maps `complexity.tier` (`low`/`medium`/`high`) to your `[routing]` table and
selects a model. On a hard/ambiguous prompt the router may escalate to an oracle LLM
(a few seconds) for a more accurate decision — size `timeout_ms` accordingly. See
[ROUTING.md](ROUTING.md).
## Verify accuracy yourself
`bench/accuracy.py` classifies a labeled prompt set through the live router — see
[BENCHMARKS.md](../BENCHMARKS.md). In our run the router scored **100% (37/37)** on
natural-language prompts vs a keyword heuristic's 32%.
+82
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
*Read this in [English](ROUTER.md).*
# Роутер (allaigate)
Cortiq Gateway — тонкий и быстрый прокси; **интеллект**, решающий *какой* модели
отдать запрос, живёт в отдельном **роутере**. Когда вы шлёте `model: "cortiq-auto"`,
шлюз вызывает `POST /v1/route` роутера, получает **тип задачи** и **полосу сложности**
и выбирает модель из вашего пула.
> Роутинг опционален. Pinned-модель (`model: "gpt-4o-mini"`) роутер **не требует** —
> шлюз всё равно полезен как универсальный прокси. Роутер делает его *умным*.
## Два способа получить роутер
1. **Хостовый — [allaigate](https://api.allaigate.com/)** (быстрее всего начать).
Управляемый семантический роутер: ~94% точности на разделении близких типов задач,
patent-pending, privacy-first. Ключ — на сайте (см. акцию ниже).
2. **Свой — `cortiq-router`.** Поднимите собственный классификатор и укажите его в шлюзе.
## 🎉 Акция (launch)
Сейчас у allaigate идёт стартовая акция:
> **Starter-ключ за $1** — промокод **`LAUNCH1`** на **https://api.allaigate.com/**
> (число активаций ограничено).
Как получить ключ: введите e-mail и промокод на главной — ключ (`cortiq_…`) сгенерируется
и покажется вам.
### Тарифы (на момент написания — актуальные условия смотрите на сайте)
| План | Цена | Включено решений | Rate limit | Сверх лимита |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Starter** | **$1/мес** (`LAUNCH1`) | безлимит | 60/мин | — |
| Developer | $9/мес | 100k | 120/мин | $0.10 / 1k |
| Pro | $49/мес | 1M | 600/мин | $0.05 / 1k |
| Scale | $299/мес | 10M | 3000/мин | $0.02 / 1k |
## Подключение шлюза к хостовому роутеру
```toml
[router]
url = "https://138.226.222.209" # routing API allaigate
verify_tls = false # серт привязан к IP
taxonomy_id = "data-assistant"
api_key_env = "CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY" # ваш ключ cortiq_…
timeout_ms = 15000 # запас под oracle-эскалацию на сложных запросах
```
```bash
export CORTIQ_ROUTER_KEY=cortiq_your_key
cortiq-gateway --config config/gateway.toml
```
## Контракт API
`POST {router}/v1/route`, `Authorization: Bearer cortiq_…`:
```jsonc
// запрос
{ "input": { "text": "Write a Python function to reverse a list" }, "taxonomy_id": "data-assistant" }
// ответ
{
"decision": {
"task_label": "code",
"confidence": 0.99,
"complexity": { "tier": "low", "score": 0.27 }
}
}
```
Шлюз сопоставляет `complexity.tier` (`low`/`medium`/`high`) с таблицей `[routing]` и
выбирает модель. На сложном/неоднозначном запросе роутер может эскалировать к oracle-LLM
(несколько секунд) для более точного решения — подберите `timeout_ms` соответственно.
См. [ROUTING.ru.md](ROUTING.ru.md).
## Проверьте точность сами
`bench/accuracy.py` прогоняет размеченный набор промптов через живой роутер — см.
[BENCHMARKS.md](../BENCHMARKS.md). В нашем прогоне роутер дал **100% (37/37)** на
естественных промптах против 32% у keyword-эвристики.
+2 -2
View File
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ async fn meta() -> ApiResult {
"tiers": ["low", "medium", "high"],
"caps": ["tools", "vision"],
"protocols_impl": {
"openai_chat": true, "openai_completions": false, "openai_embeddings": true,
"openai_models": false, "anthropic_messages": true, "mcp": true, "native_passthrough": false
"openai_chat": true, "openai_completions": true, "openai_embeddings": true,
"openai_models": true, "anthropic_messages": true, "mcp": true, "native_passthrough": true
},
"languages": ["en", "ru", "de", "fr", "es", "zh", "tr"],
}))
+6 -1
View File
@@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
pub mod anthropic_messages;
pub mod mcp;
pub mod native_passthrough;
pub mod openai_chat;
pub mod openai_completions;
pub mod openai_embeddings;
pub mod openai_models;
use crate::state::SharedState;
use axum::Router;
@@ -15,8 +18,10 @@ use axum::Router;
pub fn build_router() -> Router<SharedState> {
Router::new()
.merge(openai_chat::routes())
.merge(openai_completions::routes())
.merge(openai_embeddings::routes())
.merge(openai_models::routes())
.merge(anthropic_messages::routes())
.merge(mcp::routes())
// TODO: openai_completions, openai_models, native_passthrough.
.merge(native_passthrough::routes())
}
+86
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
//! Native passthrough adapter: `POST /route`.
//! Returns the gateway's routing decision (task type, complexity, candidate models)
//! without calling a model — direct access for clients that route themselves.
use crate::error::{GatewayError, Result};
use crate::state::SharedState;
use axum::{extract::State, response::IntoResponse, routing::post, Json, Router};
use serde::Deserialize;
pub fn routes() -> Router<SharedState> {
Router::new().route("/route", post(handler))
}
#[derive(Deserialize)]
struct RouteRequest {
/// `{ "input": { "text": "..." } }` (router-style) — optional.
#[serde(default)]
input: serde_json::Value,
/// `{ "text": "..." }` — convenience shorthand.
#[serde(default)]
text: Option<String>,
#[serde(default)]
profile: Option<String>,
}
async fn handler(
State(state): State<SharedState>,
Json(req): Json<RouteRequest>,
) -> Result<impl IntoResponse> {
let live = state.live();
if !live.cfg.protocols.native_passthrough {
return Err(GatewayError::InvalidRequest(
"native_passthrough protocol is disabled".into(),
));
}
let text = req
.text
.clone()
.or_else(|| req.input["text"].as_str().map(|s| s.to_string()))
.or_else(|| req.input.as_str().map(|s| s.to_string()))
.unwrap_or_default();
if text.is_empty() {
return Err(GatewayError::InvalidRequest(
"missing input text (use {\"text\": ...} or {\"input\": {\"text\": ...}})".into(),
));
}
let profile = req
.profile
.clone()
.unwrap_or_else(|| live.cfg.route.profile.clone());
let (decision, source, candidates) = match live.router.route(&text, &profile).await {
Ok(Some(d)) => {
let cands = live.routing.candidates(&d.complexity_tier);
(Some(d), "router", cands)
}
_ => (
None,
"fallback",
vec![live.routing.default_model().to_string()],
),
};
let selected = candidates.first().cloned().unwrap_or_default();
let decision_json = match &decision {
Some(d) => serde_json::json!({
"task_label": d.task_label,
"complexity": { "score": d.complexity_score, "tier": d.complexity_tier },
"router_request_id": d.router_request_id,
}),
None => serde_json::json!({
"task_label": "degraded",
"complexity": { "score": 0.5, "tier": "degraded" },
"router_request_id": serde_json::Value::Null,
}),
};
Ok(Json(serde_json::json!({
"decision": decision_json,
"source": source,
"candidates": candidates,
"selected_model": selected,
})))
}
+183
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
//! Inbound OpenAI Completions (legacy) adapter: `POST /v1/completions`.
//! Converts the legacy `prompt` into a single user message, runs the pipeline, and
//! returns the legacy `text_completion` shape (non-streaming JSON or streaming SSE).
use crate::error::{GatewayError, Result};
use crate::model::{ChatRequest, GenParams, Message, RequestMeta, RoutingDirective};
use crate::protocols::openai_chat::cortiq_headers;
use crate::state::SharedState;
use axum::response::{IntoResponse, Response};
use axum::{extract::State, routing::post, Json, Router};
use serde::Deserialize;
pub fn routes() -> Router<SharedState> {
Router::new().route("/v1/completions", post(handler))
}
#[derive(Deserialize)]
struct CompletionsRequest {
model: String,
prompt: serde_json::Value,
#[serde(default)]
temperature: Option<f32>,
#[serde(default)]
max_tokens: Option<u32>,
#[serde(default)]
top_p: Option<f32>,
#[serde(default)]
stream: bool,
}
fn parse_routing(model: &str) -> RoutingDirective {
if let Some(rest) = model.strip_prefix("cortiq-auto") {
RoutingDirective::Auto {
profile: rest.strip_prefix(':').map(|p| p.to_string()),
}
} else {
RoutingDirective::Pinned {
model_id: model.to_string(),
}
}
}
fn prompt_to_string(v: &serde_json::Value) -> String {
if let Some(s) = v.as_str() {
return s.to_string();
}
if let Some(arr) = v.as_array() {
return arr
.iter()
.filter_map(|x| x.as_str())
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
.join("\n");
}
String::new()
}
async fn handler(
State(state): State<SharedState>,
Json(req): Json<CompletionsRequest>,
) -> Result<Response> {
if !state.live().cfg.protocols.openai_completions {
return Err(GatewayError::InvalidRequest(
"openai_completions protocol is disabled".into(),
));
}
let prompt = prompt_to_string(&req.prompt);
if prompt.is_empty() {
return Err(GatewayError::InvalidRequest(
"prompt must not be empty".into(),
));
}
let canonical = ChatRequest {
routing: parse_routing(&req.model),
messages: vec![Message {
role: "user".into(),
content: prompt,
tool_calls: vec![],
}],
tools: vec![],
params: GenParams {
temperature: req.temperature,
max_tokens: req.max_tokens,
top_p: req.top_p,
stop: Vec::new(),
passthrough: Default::default(),
},
stream: req.stream,
meta: RequestMeta {
protocol: "openai_completions".into(),
..Default::default()
},
};
if req.stream {
let (info, stream) = state.pipeline.run_stream(canonical, &state).await?;
let mut headers = cortiq_headers(&info);
headers.insert(
axum::http::header::CONTENT_TYPE,
axum::http::HeaderValue::from_static("text/event-stream"),
);
return Ok((
headers,
axum::body::Body::from_stream(chat_to_completions_sse(stream)),
)
.into_response());
}
let resp = state.pipeline.run(canonical, &state).await?;
let answer = resp
.choices
.first()
.map(|c| c.message.content.clone())
.unwrap_or_default();
let finish = resp
.choices
.first()
.map(|c| c.finish_reason.clone())
.unwrap_or_else(|| "stop".into());
let headers = cortiq_headers(&resp.cortiq);
let body = serde_json::json!({
"id": resp.id,
"object": "text_completion",
"created": std::time::SystemTime::now()
.duration_since(std::time::UNIX_EPOCH)
.unwrap_or_default()
.as_secs(),
"model": resp.model_used,
"choices": [{ "text": answer, "index": 0, "logprobs": serde_json::Value::Null, "finish_reason": finish }],
"usage": {
"prompt_tokens": resp.usage.prompt_tokens,
"completion_tokens": resp.usage.completion_tokens,
"total_tokens": resp.usage.total_tokens,
},
});
Ok((headers, Json(body)).into_response())
}
/// Translate chat `chat.completion.chunk` SSE into legacy `text_completion` SSE
/// (`delta.content` → `text`).
fn chat_to_completions_sse(
stream: crate::providers::ChatStream,
) -> impl futures::Stream<Item = Result<bytes::Bytes>> + Send + 'static {
use futures::StreamExt;
async_stream::stream! {
let mut buf = String::new();
futures::pin_mut!(stream);
while let Some(item) = stream.next().await {
let bytes = match item { Ok(b) => b, Err(e) => { yield Err(e); break; } };
if let Ok(s) = std::str::from_utf8(&bytes) {
buf.push_str(s);
}
while let Some(idx) = buf.find("\n\n") {
let chunk: String = buf.drain(..idx + 2).collect();
for line in chunk.lines() {
let Some(data) = line.trim_start().strip_prefix("data:") else { continue };
let data = data.trim();
if data.is_empty() { continue; }
if data == "[DONE]" {
yield Ok(bytes::Bytes::from("data: [DONE]\n\n"));
continue;
}
let Ok(v) = serde_json::from_str::<serde_json::Value>(data) else { continue };
if let Some(u) = v.get("usage").filter(|u| !u.is_null()) {
yield Ok(bytes::Bytes::from(format!(
"data: {}\n\n",
serde_json::json!({"object": "text_completion", "choices": [], "usage": u})
)));
}
if let Some(t) = v["choices"][0]["delta"]["content"].as_str() {
yield Ok(bytes::Bytes::from(format!(
"data: {}\n\n",
serde_json::json!({
"object": "text_completion",
"choices": [{"text": t, "index": 0, "finish_reason": null}]
})
)));
}
}
}
}
}
}
+32
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
//! Inbound OpenAI Models adapter: `GET /v1/models`.
//! Lists the configured pool (plus the virtual `cortiq-auto`) for client discovery.
use crate::error::{GatewayError, Result};
use crate::state::SharedState;
use axum::{extract::State, response::IntoResponse, routing::get, Json, Router};
pub fn routes() -> Router<SharedState> {
Router::new().route("/v1/models", get(handler))
}
async fn handler(State(state): State<SharedState>) -> Result<impl IntoResponse> {
let live = state.live();
if !live.cfg.protocols.openai_models {
return Err(GatewayError::InvalidRequest(
"openai_models protocol is disabled".into(),
));
}
let mut data = vec![serde_json::json!({
"id": "cortiq-auto",
"object": "model",
"owned_by": "cortiq",
})];
for m in &live.cfg.models {
data.push(serde_json::json!({
"id": m.id,
"object": "model",
"owned_by": m.provider,
}));
}
Ok(Json(serde_json::json!({ "object": "list", "data": data })))
}