Files
ai-model-router/backend/app/router/engine.py
T
Sanaullah Turab d737946aac
CI / Backend Tests (Python 3.10) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Backend Tests (Python 3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Backend Tests (Python 3.12) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Frontend Build & Typecheck (push) Canceled after 0s
fix(datetime): replace deprecated utcnow() with timezone-aware equivalent (#15)
- Replaced datetime.utcnow() with datetime.now(timezone.utc) in router and observability modules
- Preserves backwards compatibility with Python 3.10+
- Fixes #14
2026-09-11 19:18:56 +05:30

151 lines
6.1 KiB
Python

import uuid
import datetime
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional
from app.models.schemas import (
ModelMetadata,
RequestAnalysis,
RoutingDecision,
CandidateScore,
PriorityLevel,
)
from app.router.scoring import filter_candidate_models, compute_candidate_score
from app.router.rules_engine import evaluate_routing_rules
from app.storage.models import RoutingRuleRecord
def generate_routing_explanation(
selected_model: ModelMetadata,
analysis: RequestAnalysis,
policy_name: str,
rule_name: Optional[str] = None,
) -> List[str]:
reasons = []
if rule_name:
reasons.append(f"Matching rule applied: \"{rule_name}\"")
# Task explanation
reasons.append(f"Task classified as {analysis.task_type.value} with {analysis.complexity_label.value} complexity ({analysis.complexity:.2f})")
# Reasoning / Code requirements
if analysis.reasoning_required:
reasons.append("Multi-step reasoning & deep inference required for problem domain")
if analysis.coding_required:
reasons.append("Syntactical & algorithmic coding capabilities required")
# Model specific match
if selected_model.tier.value == "POWER":
reasons.append(f"High reasoning score ({selected_model.quality_score * 100:.0f}%) and deep context ({selected_model.context_window:,} tokens)")
elif selected_model.tier.value == "FAST":
reasons.append(f"Low latency priority and high speed score ({selected_model.speed_score * 100:.0f}%)")
else:
reasons.append("Balanced quality and cost profile selected for optimal efficiency")
# Cost / local factor
if selected_model.cost_per_input_token == 0.0:
reasons.append("Local zero-cost execution prioritized")
elif analysis.cost_sensitivity == PriorityLevel.HIGH:
reasons.append("Cost sensitivity is HIGH — model offers lowest token pricing")
# Policy
reasons.append(f"Evaluated under '{policy_name}' policy weights")
return reasons
def route_request(
analysis: RequestAnalysis,
available_models: List[ModelMetadata],
policy_weights: Dict[str, float],
policy_name: str = "balanced",
rules: Optional[List[RoutingRuleRecord]] = None,
budget_percent: float = 0.0,
request_id: Optional[str] = None,
) -> RoutingDecision:
req_id = request_id or str(uuid.uuid4())
decision_id = f"dec_{uuid.uuid4().hex[:12]}"
now_iso = datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc).isoformat()
# 1. Rule evaluation
rule_action, rule_target, rule_name = None, None, None
if rules:
rule_action, rule_target, rule_name = evaluate_routing_rules(rules, analysis, budget_percent)
# 2. Hard filter candidates
eligible_models, rejected_dict = filter_candidate_models(available_models, analysis)
if not eligible_models:
# Fallback to any active model if everything was filtered
eligible_models = [m for m in available_models if m.is_active] or available_models
# Handle Rule Action: ROUTE_TO specific model
if rule_action == "ROUTE_TO" and rule_target:
exact_match = next((m for m in eligible_models if m.id == rule_target), None)
if exact_match:
scores = [compute_candidate_score(m, analysis, policy_weights) for m in eligible_models]
score_map = {s.model_id: s for s in scores}
selected_score = score_map.get(exact_match.id) or compute_candidate_score(exact_match, analysis, policy_weights)
reasons = generate_routing_explanation(exact_match, analysis, policy_name, rule_name)
return RoutingDecision(
decision_id=decision_id,
request_id=req_id,
selected_model=exact_match.id,
selected_model_name=exact_match.name,
provider=exact_match.provider,
tier=exact_match.tier.value if hasattr(exact_match.tier, "value") else str(exact_match.tier),
confidence=0.98,
policy_used=policy_name,
reasons=reasons,
candidate_scores=scores,
rejected_candidates=rejected_dict,
estimated_cost_usd=selected_score.estimated_cost_usd,
estimated_latency_ms=selected_score.estimated_latency_ms,
rule_applied=rule_name,
timestamp=now_iso,
)
# Handle Rule Action: FORCE_TIER
if rule_action == "FORCE_TIER" and rule_target:
tier_filtered = [m for m in eligible_models if m.tier.value.upper() == rule_target.upper()]
if tier_filtered:
eligible_models = tier_filtered
# 3. Score all eligible models
candidate_scores: List[CandidateScore] = []
for model in eligible_models:
sc = compute_candidate_score(model, analysis, policy_weights)
candidate_scores.append(sc)
# Sort descending by overall_score
candidate_scores.sort(key=lambda s: s.overall_score, reverse=True)
best_candidate = candidate_scores[0]
selected_model = next(m for m in eligible_models if m.id == best_candidate.model_id)
# Confidence calculation: score difference from second candidate
if len(candidate_scores) > 1:
gap = best_candidate.overall_score - candidate_scores[1].overall_score
confidence = min(0.99, max(0.70, round(0.80 + (gap / 100.0), 2)))
else:
confidence = 0.95
reasons = generate_routing_explanation(selected_model, analysis, policy_name, rule_name)
return RoutingDecision(
decision_id=decision_id,
request_id=req_id,
selected_model=selected_model.id,
selected_model_name=selected_model.name,
provider=selected_model.provider,
tier=selected_model.tier.value if hasattr(selected_model.tier, "value") else str(selected_model.tier),
confidence=confidence,
policy_used=policy_name,
reasons=reasons,
candidate_scores=candidate_scores,
rejected_candidates=rejected_dict,
estimated_cost_usd=best_candidate.estimated_cost_usd,
estimated_latency_ms=best_candidate.estimated_latency_ms,
rule_applied=rule_name,
timestamp=now_iso,
)